EAT-Lancet 2019 Planetary Health Diet + Springmann Nature 2018
Flexitarian Diet: How Often Sometimes Actually Is
Flexitarian eating is the largest plant-forward category in survey data, and arguably the one that delivers the most environmental benefit per practitioner because of how many people are willing to adopt it. The label is loose; this page works through the quantitative versions of flexitarian eating (EAT-Lancet, Mediterranean, semi-vegetarian) and the practical structures that make the shift sustainable.
The terms and their (loose) definitions
The word flexitarian was coined by US dietitian Dawn Jackson Blatner in her 2009 book of the same name. Her original framing was loose: a diet that is mostly vegetarian with some meat included, primarily for health or environmental reasons rather than ethical absolutism. Reducetarian, coined by Brian Kateman around 2014, broadly means "consciously reducing meat consumption without committing to a fixed level." Semi-vegetarian appears in academic cohort studies and is typically operationalised as eating meat less than once per week.
None of these terms has a fixed legal or certifiable definition. There is no Flexitarian Society analogous to the Vegan Society. The Lancet Planetary Health Diet provides the most published quantitative target: 14 g of red meat and 29 g of poultry per day, totalling about 300 g per week of red and white meat combined, plus about 200 g of fish. UK average meat consumption is around 980 g per week per person; US average is closer to 1,400 g. The EAT-Lancet target represents roughly a 70 to 80% reduction from current Western consumption.
For this page, flexitarian will mean the EAT-Lancet target range as a reasonable working number, and the practical advice will scale from there. Eat less meat than you do now is the directionally correct intervention regardless of where you start.
The environmental case in numbers
The Poore and Nemecek 2018 Science meta-analysis (database of 38,700 farms across 119 countries) is the standard reference for food-system greenhouse gas footprints. The published figures per kg of protein delivered: beef 50 kg CO2e, lamb 20 kg, dairy beef 17 kg, cheese 11 kg, pork 8 kg, poultry 6 kg, eggs 4.5 kg, farmed fish 6 kg, wild-caught small fish 2 to 4 kg, tofu 2 kg, legumes 0.8 kg. The dominance of beef in the footprint of a typical Western diet is overwhelming; halving beef intake while keeping everything else constant reduces total food-system emissions by 25 to 35%.
The Springmann et al. 2018 Nature paper modelled global food-system futures and concluded that universal adoption of EAT-Lancet planetary health diet would reduce food-system greenhouse emissions by approximately 50% and would keep land use, freshwater use, and nitrogen and phosphorus flows within planetary boundaries by 2050. No other proposed dietary pattern in the modelling achieves this. The implication is that flexitarian eating at scale is the realistic policy lever for food-system sustainability; full vegan adoption is not a realistic global expectation.
At the individual level, the practical implication is that reducing meat consumption matters more than achieving zero. Cutting beef from 600 g per week to 100 g per week delivers most of the carbon benefit of going fully vegan. This is partly why environmental NGOs and lifestyle medicine groups increasingly frame flexitarian as the realistic ask rather than the moral compromise.
The health evidence
The Adventist Health Study-2 cohort, which separates semi-vegetarians from vegetarians and vegans, has the most useful published data on flexitarian-equivalent diets. Semi-vegetarians (meat less than once weekly in this study) had mortality rates between non-vegetarians and lacto-ovo vegetarians, with hazard ratios consistent with a dose-response relationship between meat consumption and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.
The Mediterranean diet RCT evidence (PREDIMED trial, n=7,447) showed approximately 30% reduction in cardiovascular events on a Mediterranean diet supplemented with olive oil or nuts. The diet in question is functionally flexitarian: rich in vegetables, legumes, whole grains, olive oil, fish, occasional dairy and poultry, minimal red meat. This is the highest-quality randomised evidence for any plant-forward dietary pattern.
The pragmatic synthesis: flexitarian eating delivers most of the cardiovascular and metabolic benefit of vegetarian eating with less behavioural constraint. The marginal additional benefit of vegan over flexitarian is real but smaller than the flexitarian-over-omnivore step. For people who want to do something but cannot commit to a stricter diet, this is a defensible scientific position.
The structures that work
| Structure | How it works | Approximate meat reduction |
|---|---|---|
| Meatless Monday | One full meat-free day per week | ~14% |
| Meat for one meal per day | Vegetarian breakfast and lunch, meat at dinner | ~50% |
| Weekday vegetarian | Plant-based Mon to Fri, flexible weekends | ~65 to 70% |
| Vegan before 6pm | Mark Bittman's framework: vegan during day, flexible evening | ~50 to 60% |
| One meat day per week | Six plant-based days, one meat day | ~85% |
| EAT-Lancet target | ~100 g red meat and ~200 g poultry per week | ~70 to 80% from Western average |
| Mediterranean | Fish twice weekly, red meat once monthly, regular legumes | ~75% |
| Reducetarian (informal) | Less than current, no fixed target | Variable |
The published behaviour-change literature consistently shows that structured patterns work better than open-ended reduction. The cognitive load of deciding meat or no meat at every meal is exhausting; the fixed pattern eliminates the decision. Whichever structure fits your life, pick one and run it for two months before evaluating.
What to put on the flexitarian plate
For plant-based meals, the building blocks are: legumes (lentils, chickpeas, beans), tofu or tempeh, whole grains (brown rice, quinoa, whole-grain pasta, sourdough bread), vegetables, fruit, nuts and seeds, fortified plant milks. The same building blocks as a vegan or vegetarian diet, organised similarly.
For the meat or fish you do eat, prioritise: lower-impact protein per gram (small wild fish, mussels, oysters, chicken over beef where you want meat); higher-welfare sources (RSPCA Assured, Soil Association organic, Marine Stewardship Council); and intentionality (a roast chicken at Sunday lunch with leftovers stretched across the week, rather than fast-food beef burgers).
For dairy and eggs, treat them similarly: moderate intake, prioritise quality and welfare, use plant alternatives (fortified soy milk, vegan cheese) where they work well to free up the dairy budget for things that genuinely matter on your plate. A flexitarian who keeps Italian-style aged Parmesan but switches breakfast milk to fortified soy is making a coherent choice.
Related diet-type pages
Keep reading
Frequently asked questions about flexitarianism
What counts as flexitarian?
Does flexitarian eating actually help the environment?
Is flexitarian healthier than vegetarian or omnivore?
What is the EAT-Lancet Planetary Health Diet?
Is flexitarian the same as Mediterranean diet?
How do I actually start eating flexitarian?
Sources cited. Willett W et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems, Lancet 2019; 393: 447-492; Springmann M et al. Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits, Nature 2018; 562: 519-525; Poore J, Nemecek T. Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers, Science 2018; 360: 987-992; Estruch R et al. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with a Mediterranean diet (PREDIMED), NEJM 2013; 368: 1279-1290; Orlich MJ et al. Vegetarian dietary patterns and mortality in Adventist Health Study 2, JAMA Intern Med 2013; 173: 1230-1238; Blatner DJ. The Flexitarian Diet, McGraw-Hill 2009. All values as of May 2026.